The growth of medical technology
threatens the cultural contribution of medicine
|
by claiming an ever larger slice
of medical training time. The technologist is a new
|
cultural type, portentous product
of our lay culture, focus both of its admiration
|
and of its dread. Medicine is not
the only profession which is threatened by
|
assimilation to the role of the
technologist and, thus, to a role which is expected to
|
solve problems, not to pose them.
Doctors respond with inventions which impress
|
a technologically minded lay
culture, win larger appropriations of funds, attract
|
higher concentrations of brains
and produce even more improbable inventions,
|
thus completing the self
-exciting spiral which typifies one relation between the
|
professional and the lay culture.
But our culture also fears technology and all the
|
that in our hospitals, though the
technological resources for processing cases grow
|
constantly in refinement and cost
per bed, the human resources for caring for sick
|
persons steadily decline. It is
more distressing because we know well that their
|
decline would be even more
striking if it were not masked by the massive
|
technological aid which the over
-developed countries win from the under-
|
developed ones by attracting
their potential doctors and nurses and keeping them
|
after training in numbers so much
larger than the more publicized trickle which
|
flows the other way. Consequently
the lay culture is deeply concerned with
|
humanizing its mass organization
and for this to preserve and extend the function
|
of personal counselling.
PAGE NO 46
http://folk.uio.no/regie/litteratur/Artikler/technology.htm
|
No comments:
Post a Comment